{"id":6960,"date":"2023-08-06T20:08:41","date_gmt":"2023-08-07T00:08:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/?p=6960"},"modified":"2023-08-06T20:08:41","modified_gmt":"2023-08-07T00:08:41","slug":"august-1st-17th-negotiating-session","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/august-1st-17th-negotiating-session\/","title":{"rendered":"August 1st, 17th NEGOTIATING SESSION"},"content":{"rendered":"
August 1st, 11:30 AM @ Roy and Diana Vagelos Education Center (CUMC), Rooms 404-405<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Informal Organizing Committee notes<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Your participation in Bargaining is very much appreciated! Join us in person<\/a> or on our Slack channel<\/a> to share your opinion\/thoughts\/concerns.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Take home message<\/strong> – We Tentatively Agreed the articles on Professional Development, and Copyright & intellectual Property. We won the right to have additional Faculty members as co-mentors. Over the years we have learned it\u2019s extremely beneficial to avoid all our careers depending on one single individual (or their reference letter). We have also established new venues to resolve and improve authorship and IP policy at Columbia. These are softer wins that we will need to ensure we strengthen during the life of our new contract.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n We start at 11:38 AM presenting our updated articles for Copyright & Intellectual Property (Art 6) and Professional Development (Art 19).<\/p>\n\n\n\n We are describing how much we simplified the language and we are explaining why we retained what is currently in our proposal. <\/p>\n\n\n\n We then moved to article 6 and described the changes, as well as examples from other universities that are in agreement with our proposal, including an example of an invention report<\/em> from Columbia from 2004.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mike Shelanski (Faculty member and member from the University side) has commented that we are insane to propose something like this and stood up and left the room.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Our UAW servicing rep, Reisy, described the number of concessions we have agreed to and their behavior is very offensive. We provided documentation that clearly shows the number of movements made from our side and it’s disrespectful to treat us like this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We were called “ingenuous” for continuing the conversation on Professional Development and IP because it isn’t in their framework to discuss something in this topic<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n The argument continues and we keep explaining that we need to understand why they defend their position and we cannot accept a simple no without explanation.<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n At 12:36 PM we have a lunch caucus. We reconvene at 2:10 PM<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n We verbally offered to drop Article 6 with the suggestion of a working group that would function similarly to the anti-bullying working group that was put in place by our first contract in 2020, leading to a policy proposal that will become the university anti-bullying policy. While they have not agreed to this offer just yet, this is currently an open discussion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Before dropping article 6, we made it very clear that their argument against it it’s not based on facts, as we know this works at other universities and we show plenty of proof of how this would make sense in a union contract.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n We are now moving to discuss ART. 19: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT<\/a> in more detail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n At 3:29 PM we asked clarity on whether the university will have a counter proposal on our language and they are taking a caucus to discuss this topic<\/em>. They are back at 4:34 PM<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Admin came back with two proposals regarding IP and Authorship disputes (not in written yet):<\/p>\n\n\n\n We request to see it in written. They request a caucus. At 5:40 PM they bring back their proposals.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n We request a caucus to discuss their proposals and next steps.<\/em>\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n During the caucus we discussed some minor changes to Admin’s proposal on Art 6, 19, and 20, but we generally believe this is a win on our side that will allow us to improve IP and professional development policies at Columbia, similarly with what we achieved with Power-based harassment<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At 6:47 PM we resumed the session and asked a few questions about their proposal<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n At 7:08 PM, we requested one more short caucus to discuss their response to our edits to the proposal<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n When we re-convened we continued discussion on the Articles and Tentatively Agreed to these articles:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The session ended around 8:30 PM<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n Read the notes from the other sessions<\/a>!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Follow our next emails with updates on future steps and debriefing sessions!!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Reach out to us to get involved!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Follow us on social media! Twitter<\/a>, Instagram<\/a>, TikTok<\/a>, Facebook<\/a>, and join our and Slack<\/a>\u200b.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Share this info with your friends and colleagues!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" August 1st, 11:30 AM @ Roy and Diana Vagelos Education Center (CUMC), Rooms 404-405 Informal Organizing Committee notes Your participation in Bargaining is very much appreciated! Join us in person or on our Slack channel to share your opinion\/thoughts\/concerns. Take<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":6907,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6960"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6960"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6960\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6961,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6960\/revisions\/6961"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6907"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6960"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6960"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6960"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}ART. 19: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
ART. 6: COPYRIGHT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
080123-CU-Proposal Art 6, 16, 20<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
080623-Tentative Agreement – Articles 6 19 2<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
ART. 6: COPYRIGHT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY<\/strong>: <\/h3>\n\n\n\n
ARTICLE 20: RESEARCH INTEGRITY<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
ARTICLE 19: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nDO YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE?<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n