{"id":6905,"date":"2023-07-10T19:43:12","date_gmt":"2023-07-10T23:43:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/?p=6905"},"modified":"2023-07-10T19:43:13","modified_gmt":"2023-07-10T23:43:13","slug":"june-30th-14th-negotiating-session","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/june-30th-14th-negotiating-session\/","title":{"rendered":"June 30th, 14th NEGOTIATING SESSION"},"content":{"rendered":"
June 30th, 12:00 PM @ Hammer Building (CUMC), Room LL-110<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Informal Organizing Committee notes<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Your participation in Bargaining is very much appreciated! Join us in person<\/a> or on our Slack channel<\/a> to share your opinion\/thoughts\/concerns.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Take home message<\/strong> – After a long day CU Admin gave us a COMPLETE OFFER OF SETTLEMENT that fell short of addressing the needs of Columbia\u2019s postdocs\/ARSs. Not only are the minimum salaries completely inadequate ($63,600 for postdocs and $70,066 for ARSs), but they also disregarded our request for additional economic support from Columbia’s Central Money, rather than relying solely on research grants. We adjourned the session around 8:30 PM, with most of our members having already left. Negotiations will resume after the 4th of July break.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Just a reminder, during yesterday’s session, CU Admin made some positive moves in non-economic areas with regards to their offer<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Overall, we made some progress in certain non-economic articles, and these wins should be celebrated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At 12:31 PM, CU Admin entered the room, and we began reviewing the package they provided us yesterday. We agreed to their proposed changes in the Recognition section, but we still need to discuss the Appointments article further.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We also reached an agreement on their suggested changes in the Side Letter regarding Bullying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At 12:54 PM, we took a caucus to regroup and discuss internally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We reconvened at 2:53 PM, and during that session, we presented an alternative language for Article 12, Section 10 (ART 12: INTERNATIONAL EMPLOYEES<\/a>). Our changes specifically address the costs that postdocs\/ARSs incur to maintain their visa status. CU Admin had some questions about Visa Status, DS-2019, and related matters. <\/p>\n\n\n\n We are also working to ensure that CU does not misinterpret our stance on the Tentative Agreement for non-economic topics. In their package, they write that we were open to a Tentative Agreement on all non-economic matters, but we clarify that we only agreed to specific language changes. This approach is unconventional, as an article is either fully Tentatively agreed upon or not. CU Admin acknowledges this point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Despite CU’s belief that most of the non-economic topics do not require further discussion, we have repeatedly requested them to address compensation. However, they insist on resolving minor issues before providing a different compensation number.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Our bargaining committee (BC) team has stressed the importance of discussing compensation regardless of whether the non-economic discussions are concluded. We have repeatedly emphasized that non-economic matters should not impact compensation, but CU Admin continues to disagree with us on this point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At 3:21 PM, CU Admin requested a caucus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At 5:55 PM, CU Admin invited us to their room to present an offer of settlement. They clarified that the offer doesn’t need to be final and can be adjusted as needed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Day 14 – COMPLETE OFFER OF SETTLEMENT<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n CU Admin emphasizes that this offer reflects a serious effort on their part to reach an agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We noted that CU Admin once again included articles in their offer as tentative agreements, even though we have not tentatively agreed on them (wrong TAs in Appointments, Discharge and Discipline, Professional Development, Workspace and materials and Miscellaneous (bathroom equity). While they verbally acknowledged our non-agreement, their written documentation still states otherwise.<\/strong>\u00a0 At 8:06 PM, the bargaining committee (consisting of Cora, Thiago, and Reisy at this point) reiterated that there was no tentative agreement reached regarding the aforementioned articles\/sections. They expressed the desire to adjourn the session for the day, as most participants had already left.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The bargaining committee informed CU Admin that there are still numerous unresolved issues, including the unreasonable economic offer presented earlier in the day. They emphasized that, from this point forward, the university must maintain the status quo while negotiations continue<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The bargaining committee will communicate new dates for the next bargaining sessions on Monday, and the current session was officially adjourned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Around 8:30-9 PM the session ends.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n Read the notes from the other sessions<\/a>!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Follow our next emails with updates on future steps and debriefing sessions!!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Reach out to us to get involved!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Follow us on social media! Twitter<\/a>, Instagram<\/a>, TikTok<\/a>, Facebook<\/a>, and join our and Slack<\/a>\u200b.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Share this info with your friends and colleagues!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" June 30th, 12:00 PM @ Hammer Building (CUMC), Room LL-110 Informal Organizing Committee notes Your participation in Bargaining is very much appreciated! Join us in person or on our Slack channel to share your opinion\/thoughts\/concerns. Take home message – After<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":6907,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6905"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6905"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6905\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6908,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6905\/revisions\/6908"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6907"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/columbiapostdocunion.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Review CU Admin package<\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Correct the Record! While we have not agreed to all non-economics we want to discuss economics:<\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
CU\u2019s Admin Offer of Settlement<\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Correcting the record again <\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
To address this discrepancy and ensure a clear record, we sent an email at 8:02 PM, by our UAW servicing representative, requesting written clarification and correction of the official record. [READ THE EMAIL BELOW]\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nDO YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE?<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n